|
North Florida Research and Education Center - Suwannee Valley
|
.
Research Report 2003-02 |
Evaluation of
Several Collard Varieties for Summer Production in North Florida
Robert C. Hochmuth, Suzanne Stapleton, Adam
Townsend, Steve Olson1
Introduction
This observational trial was conducted to evaluate eight collard varieties
for their production potential during the late spring and early summer
period. Collard production in North Florida normally ends in the spring
due to high temperatures and begins again in the early fall, leaving the
summer period of June – September without production. Market demands are
still good through the summer months if the right varieties and production
practices could be used to provide good quality collards.
Material and Methods
Observational plots were established in a Lakeland fine sand at the North
Florida Research and Education Center – Suwannee Valley, near Live Oak, FL.
Plots were established after fertilizing the soil with 500 lbs/A of 13-4-13 (N-P2O5-K2O).
The soil was bedded, pressed, and fumigated prior to covering with black
polyethylene mulch. Drip tape (Roberts RoDrip®) was applied to the bed center
in a 1-inch deep groove in the bed top as the mulch was laid. The black plastic
mulch was painted white using a CO2 propellant sprayer. The paint
was a mixture of white latex paint and water (1:5 mixture). The white paint was
used to reduce the bed temperature to benefit the collard crop during the high
temperatures of May-July. A white-on-black plastic mulch could also be used if
available.
Collard transplants of eight varieties
(Table 1) were planted in single plots on May 15, 2002. Two rows per bed were
planted with plant spacing of 12 inches in each row. Each plot was planted with
28 transplants.
Harvests were made on June 14, and July
25. Harvests were conducted by removing individual leaves and stems of
marketable size. Total harvested collard weight per plot was taken at each
harvest. In addition, on June 14, each variety sample was processed at a
commercial fresh cut location. The final marketable cut collard yield per plot
was measured and recorded. The grower also gave a texture rating of 1-10 for
each plot, with 1 = too tender and 10 = best crisp texture.
|
Fig 1.
Top Bunch collard. |
|
Fig 2.
Blue Max collard. |
|
Fig 3.
Flash collard. |
Results and Discussion
In general, the collard varieties grew well during the spring season. Top Bunch
(Fig 1) produced 25 lbs/plot (Table 1) followed by Blue Max (21 lbs/plot) (Fig
2), and Flash (20 lbs/plot) (Fig 3). The variety, Vates, only produced 15
lbs/plot. After all samples were graded and evaluated at the processing
facility, only Top Bunch and Blue Max retained over 20 lbs/plot of marketable
yield. A texture rating was also given by the grower. These ratings were based
on the acceptability as a cut green. If greens are too tender, a lower rating
was given. Blue Max was given the highest rating in this test.
These plots were maintained during June
and harvested again on July 25. Top yields over the mid summer period were
found in Top Bunch and Blue Max. Poor summer yields were found in Vates and
Morris Heading.
Blue Max leaf structure was different
than other cultivars in that it has a very small petiole. This results in large
leaves and seemed to be an advantage in the early season. Leaf quality for the
July 25 harvest of Blue Max was poor due to excessive toughness. The overall
evaluation of the varieties for the observational study indicated Top Bunch was
the best choice overall for late spring and summer production, but Flash also
showed promise.
Table 1.
Yield and quality of eight collard varieties produced during the late spring and
summer of 2002 in North Florida.
|
Collard Varieties |
June 14 |
July 25
Total Yield
(lbs/plot) |
|
Yield (lbs/plot) |
Texture
Rating x (1-10) |
|
Totalz |
Marketabley |
|
Champion |
18 |
16.0 |
6 |
15.0 |
|
Blue Max |
21 |
20.8 |
10 |
20.0 |
|
Heavy Crop |
17 |
16.8 |
7 |
16.5 |
|
Flash |
20 |
18.5 |
7 |
17.5 |
|
Georgia |
19 |
15.1 |
9 |
17.0 |
|
Top Bunch |
25 |
21.7 |
8 |
23.0 |
|
Vates |
15 |
13.1 |
9 |
11.0 |
|
Morris Heading |
19 |
18.0 |
9 |
10.0 |
|
z
Total yield was the weight of harvested leaves.
y
Final marketable yield was weight of cut greens after commercial machine
chopping.
x
Texture rating was 1-10; 1 = too tender, 10 = best texture (crisp). |
1
Authors
|